Dein Suchergebnis zum Thema: alle

Proof comprehension, proof validation, & proof construction: All the same or different

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/forschen/publikationen/proof-comprehension-proof-validation-proof-construction

Mathematical proof is essential for mathematics as a discipline. Thus, mathematics students are expected to learn to handle proofs proficiently in multiple situations, for example, when constructing, comprehending, or validating proofs. However, there is only limited evidence on whether performances in proof construction, comprehension, and validation can better be described by one overall mathematical proof skill or multiple skills that may be highly related but are still separable. In particular, prior theoretical conceptions and empirical research provide no conclusive evidence in either direction. The present study empirically addresses this issue by comparing five different structural equation models (SEM), ranging from a 1-dimensional overall skill to 2-dimensional models to a 3-dimensional model with individual skills for each activity. Evidence from 153 undergraduate mathematics students showed that a 2-dimensional model corresponding to a skill for proof construction and a combined second skill for proof comprehension and validation matches the data best and is superior to the other models based on multiple criteria for SEM model fit and comparison. While both skills are highly related, data still suggests that they should be conceived as separate skills. The finding has implications for ways how validating and comprehending proofs could be incorporated into learning how to handle mathematical proofs.
Karriere Leichte Sprache Gebärdensprache EnglishDeutsch Startseite Forschen Alle

Proof comprehension, proof validation, & proof construction: All the same or different

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/forschen/publikationen/proof-comprehension-proof-validation-proof-construction?show_navhelper=1

Mathematical proof is essential for mathematics as a discipline. Thus, mathematics students are expected to learn to handle proofs proficiently in multiple situations, for example, when constructing, comprehending, or validating proofs. However, there is only limited evidence on whether performances in proof construction, comprehension, and validation can better be described by one overall mathematical proof skill or multiple skills that may be highly related but are still separable. In particular, prior theoretical conceptions and empirical research provide no conclusive evidence in either direction. The present study empirically addresses this issue by comparing five different structural equation models (SEM), ranging from a 1-dimensional overall skill to 2-dimensional models to a 3-dimensional model with individual skills for each activity. Evidence from 153 undergraduate mathematics students showed that a 2-dimensional model corresponding to a skill for proof construction and a combined second skill for proof comprehension and validation matches the data best and is superior to the other models based on multiple criteria for SEM model fit and comparison. While both skills are highly related, data still suggests that they should be conceived as separate skills. The finding has implications for ways how validating and comprehending proofs could be incorporated into learning how to handle mathematical proofs.
Karriere Leichte Sprache Gebärdensprache EnglishDeutsch Startseite Forschen Alle

Im Gespräch mit dem Leibniz PostDoc Network: Katharina Düsing über die interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit im Projekt VideT – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/das-ipn/aktuelles/aktuelle-meldungen/im-gespraech-mit-dem-leibniz-postdoc-network-katharina-duesing-ueber-die-interdisziplinaere-zusammenarbeit-im-projekt-videt

Im Rahmen einer Interviewreihe zur Interdisziplinarität in der Forschung spricht IPN-Wissenschaftlerin Dr. Katharina Düsing über das Verbundprojekt VideT und reflektiert gemeinsam mit drei weiteren Projektkolleg:innen über den Mehrwert der interdisziplinären Zusammenarbeit und die möglichen Risiken.
Sie alle forschen im Verbundprojekt VideT, dessen Ziel es ist, ein videobasiertes

Den Übergang von der Schule zur Hochschule erfolgreich gestalten – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/fuer-die-gesellschaft/ipn-journal/ausgabe-10/artikel-11

Vertreterinnen und Vertreter aus Schulpraxis und Hochschulen erarbeiteten in Schleswig-Holstein gemeinsam einen Aufgabenkatalog für die mathematischen Voraussetzungen eines MINT-Studiums
Innerhalb Schleswig-Holsteins wird der Katalog an alle Schulen mit gymnasialer Oberstufe