Dein Suchergebnis zum Thema: Einhorn

Eine der umstrittensten Fragen unserer Zeit ist, ob die rasante, weltweite Verbreitung digitaler Medien mitverantwortlich für die Schwächung der Demokratie ist. Technologieunternehmen argumentieren, dass die Auswirkungen auf die Demokratie nicht eindeutig sind. Pauschal zu verteufeln sind digitale Medien sicherlich nicht. Allerdings können sie Polarisierung und Populismus – besonders in etablierten Demokratien – befeuern. Darauf weist eine Studie des Max-Planck-Instituts für Bildungsforschung, der Hertie School in Berlin und der University of Bristol hin.
der Forschung Infografiken Podcast-Serien Presse-Newsletter Kontakt Maria Einhorn

Forschende analysieren transformative Entscheidungen, die das Leben nachhaltig verändern und persönliche Identität beeinflussen.
der Forschung Infografiken Podcast-Serien Presse-Newsletter Kontakt Maria Einhorn

Some decisions in life are so significant that they have a massive impact on the course of a person’s future. Whether it’s the decision to emigrate, quit a job, end a long-term relationship, or report a sexual assault, these choices are transformative. They shape personal identities and life trajectories in unpredictable and often irreversible ways. A new conceptual paper by researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development offers a framework for understanding and studying these life-changing decisions.
Images of Science On Location Infographics Press Newsletter Contact Maria Einhorn

Die Ängste gegenüber dem Einsatz von Künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) am Arbeitsplatz unterscheiden sich je nach Beruf und Land erheblich. Das haben Forschende unter Leitung des Max-Planck-Instituts für Bildungsforschung in einer repräsentativen Studie herausgefunden. Die Forschenden untersuchten die Einstellungen der Bevölkerung in 20 Ländern zur Nutzung von KI in sechs Tätigkeitsfeldern
der Forschung Infografiken Podcast-Serien Presse-Newsletter Kontakt Maria Einhorn

Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development have identified who is most susceptible to online misinformation and why. Their meta-analysis reveals surprising patterns on how demographic and psychological factors—including age, education, political identity, analytical thinking, and motivated reflection—affect people’s ability to assess the accuracy of information. For instance, individuals with higher levels of education are just as likely to fall for misinformation as those with a lower level of education. The work, published in the journal PNAS, provides important information for theory building and designing interventions.
Images of Science On Location Infographics Press Newsletter Contact Maria Einhorn

Fears about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace vary substantially across occupations and countries, researchers led by the Max Planck Institute for Human Development have found in a representative study. They examined public attitudes in 20 countries toward AI in six occupations, including doctors, judges, and journalists. The findings, published in American Psychologist, can help AI designers and policymakers anticipate how new AI developments will be received in different nations, and address fears in a principled yet culturally sensitive manner.
Images of Science On Location Infographics Press Newsletter Contact Maria Einhorn

Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development have identified who is most susceptible to online misinformation and why. Their meta-analysis reveals surprising patterns on how demographic and psychological factors—including age, education, political identity, analytical thinking, and motivated reflection—affect people’s ability to assess the accuracy of information. For instance, individuals with higher levels of education are just as likely to fall for misinformation as those with a lower level of education. The work, published in the journal PNAS, provides important information for theory building and designing interventions.
Images of Science On Location Infographics Press Newsletter Contact Maria Einhorn

Neue Studie aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung. Forschende haben untersucht, wer besonders anfällig für Online-Fehlinformationen ist und warum. Ihre Metaanalyse zeigt überraschende Muster, wie demografische und psychologische Faktoren – darunter Alter, Bildung, politische Identität, analytisches Denken und motivierte Reflexion – die Fähigkeit von Menschen beeinflussen, die Richtigkeit von Informationen einzuschätzen. So sind beispielsweise Personen mit einem höheren Bildungsniveau genauso anfällig für Fehlinformationen wie Menschen mit einem niedrigeren Bildungsstand.
der Forschung Infografiken Podcast-Serien Presse-Newsletter Kontakt Maria Einhorn

Fears about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace vary substantially across occupations and countries, researchers led by the Max Planck Institute for Human Development have found in a representative study. They examined public attitudes in 20 countries toward AI in six occupations, including doctors, judges, and journalists. The findings, published in American Psychologist, can help AI designers and policymakers anticipate how new AI developments will be received in different nations, and address fears in a principled yet culturally sensitive manner.
Contact Maria Einhorn Press & Public Relations Max Planck Institute for Human

Fears about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace vary substantially across occupations and countries, researchers led by the Max Planck Institute for Human Development have found in a representative study. They examined public attitudes in 20 countries toward AI in six occupations, including doctors, judges, and journalists. The findings, published in American Psychologist, can help AI designers and policymakers anticipate how new AI developments will be received in different nations, and address fears in a principled yet culturally sensitive manner.
Images of Science On Location Infographics Press Newsletter Contact Maria Einhorn