Meintest du stage?
Autorenhinweise des Verlags Taylor & Francis sind hier abrufbar Sage Journals Das
Holland’s RIASEC theory posits that career choices are guided by the desire to establish congruence between individual interests and environmental activity opportunities. Furthermore, the theory states that most individuals exhibit interests that are consistent with the circular ordering of RIASEC domains, thereby rendering specific interest constellations unlikely. Therefore, as activity opportunities provided by many environments are inconsistent with the circular RIASEC order, the question emerges as to which individuals they attract. In this article, we examine the plausibility of three different scenarios that assert inconsistent environments (A) attract individuals with similarly inconsistent interests; (B) attract individuals with consistent, but only partially congruent interests; and (C) attract individuals with overall strong interests. Data collected within three university majors (N = 553)—two consistent (emphasizing either R or S) and one inconsistent (emphasizing both R and S)—support Scenario B, suggesting that inconsistent environments are linked to lower congruence and greater interest diversity.
Erschienen in Journal of Career Development, 52(4) Seiten 427–448 Herausgeber (Verlag) SAGE
Holland’s RIASEC theory posits that career choices are guided by the desire to establish congruence between individual interests and environmental activity opportunities. Furthermore, the theory states that most individuals exhibit interests that are consistent with the circular ordering of RIASEC domains, thereby rendering specific interest constellations unlikely. Therefore, as activity opportunities provided by many environments are inconsistent with the circular RIASEC order, the question emerges as to which individuals they attract. In this article, we examine the plausibility of three different scenarios that assert inconsistent environments (A) attract individuals with similarly inconsistent interests; (B) attract individuals with consistent, but only partially congruent interests; and (C) attract individuals with overall strong interests. Data collected within three university majors (N = 553)—two consistent (emphasizing either R or S) and one inconsistent (emphasizing both R and S)—support Scenario B, suggesting that inconsistent environments are linked to lower congruence and greater interest diversity.
Erschienen in Journal of Career Development, 52(4) Seiten 427–448 Herausgeber (Verlag) SAGE
While there is ample theoretical and empirical evidence detailing which conditions benefit learning from one’s own errors, the evidence on learning from others’ errors has not yet been synthesized. In this meta-analysis, we examine the overall impact of erroneous examples on learning and the effects of potential moderating variables based on a novel framework. Following the robust variance estimation method, we synthesized findings from 42 papers (177 effect sizes) comparing erroneous examples with correct examples or problem-solving in experimental studies. The results revealed a statistically significant but weak effect of erroneous examples on learning (g = .136). Further analysis indicated a statistically significant moderating effect of the design of error-explanation activities. Specifically, providing self-explanation prompts or instructional explanations enhanced learning from erroneous examples more than not providing any error explanations. Our findings draw attention to the design of error explanation activities as well as several areas for future research.
Originalsprache Englisch Erschienen in Review of Educational Research Herausgeber (Verlag) Sage
While there is ample theoretical and empirical evidence detailing which conditions benefit learning from one’s own errors, the evidence on learning from others’ errors has not yet been synthesized. In this meta-analysis, we examine the overall impact of erroneous examples on learning and the effects of potential moderating variables based on a novel framework. Following the robust variance estimation method, we synthesized findings from 42 papers (177 effect sizes) comparing erroneous examples with correct examples or problem-solving in experimental studies. The results revealed a statistically significant but weak effect of erroneous examples on learning (g = .136). Further analysis indicated a statistically significant moderating effect of the design of error-explanation activities. Specifically, providing self-explanation prompts or instructional explanations enhanced learning from erroneous examples more than not providing any error explanations. Our findings draw attention to the design of error explanation activities as well as several areas for future research.
Originalsprache Englisch Erschienen in Review of Educational Research Herausgeber (Verlag) Sage
Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler haben ein Papier geschrieben. In dem Papier geht es um KI-Sprachsysteme und wie man mit diesen gut Lernen kann.
Die Experten sagen: Wir sollen die Computer-Programme nicht verbieten.
Der Senat von der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft hat gesagt, dass der Bund und die Länder dem IPN weiterhin Geld zahlen sollen. Das haben sie nach einer Überprüfung gesagt. Ein Senat ist in vielen Organisation eine Gruppe mit wichtigen Personen.
Danach schreiben sie einen Bericht, in dem sie ihre Meinung sagen.
Prof. Knut Neumann, Direktor der IPN-Abteilung Didaktik der Physik, im Gespräch mit Julia André und Britta Kölling über die Elternperspektive zu künstlicher Intelligenz in der Schule
Ich muss sagen, mir ist ein bisschen schwindelig geworden zu sehen, was da alles
In Deutschland treffen sich derzeit viele Menschen auf Demonstrationen. Das sind Versammlungen, um zu zeigen: Demokratie ist wichtig. Menschenwürde und Gesetze sind wichtig. Diese Dinge dürfen sich nicht ändern.
Wir sagen: Angriffe auf unsere Verfassung sind nicht akzeptabel.
Forschende plädieren in einem Artikel der Fachzeitschrift Science für eine stärkere Berücksichtigung gesellschaftspolitischer Faktoren innerhalb der Humangenetik. Prof. Dr. Ute Harms, Leiterin der Abteilung Didaktik der Biologie am IPN, ist Mitglied der Autor:innengruppe und erläutert im Interview die Empfehlungen.
sozioökonomisch benachteiligten Verhältnissen… Dazu muss man vielleicht auch noch einmal sagen
