Dein Suchergebnis zum Thema: Model

Meintest du modell?

Using a large language model to provide individualized feedback for pre-service physics

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/forschen/publikationen/using-a-pretrained-language-model-to-provide-individualized-feedback-for-pre-service-physics-teachers-written-reflections

Consequently, we investigate ways in which AI in the form of a large language model – To address this issue, we used a pre-trained large language model and fine-tuned – Our results show that the pre-trained language model allowed a sufficient classification
EnglishDeutsch Startseite Forschen Alle Publikationen des IPN Using a large language model

Using a large language model to provide individualized feedback for pre-service physics

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/forschen/publikationen/using-a-pretrained-language-model-to-provide-individualized-feedback-for-pre-service-physics-teachers-written-reflections?show_navhelper=1

Consequently, we investigate ways in which AI in the form of a large language model – To address this issue, we used a pre-trained large language model and fine-tuned – Our results show that the pre-trained language model allowed a sufficient classification
EnglishDeutsch Startseite Forschen Alle Publikationen des IPN Using a large language model

Proof comprehension, proof validation, & proof construction: All the same or different skills? An answer based on an empirical analysis – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/forschen/publikationen/proof-comprehension-proof-validation-proof-construction

ranging from a 1-dimensional overall skill to 2-dimensional models to a 3-dimensional model – Evidence from 153 undergraduate mathematics students showed that a 2-dimensional model – data best and is superior to the other models based on multiple criteria for SEM model
ranging from a 1-dimensional overall skill to 2-dimensional models to a 3-dimensional model

Proof comprehension, proof validation, & proof construction: All the same or different skills? An answer based on an empirical analysis – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/forschen/publikationen/proof-comprehension-proof-validation-proof-construction?show_navhelper=1

ranging from a 1-dimensional overall skill to 2-dimensional models to a 3-dimensional model – Evidence from 153 undergraduate mathematics students showed that a 2-dimensional model – data best and is superior to the other models based on multiple criteria for SEM model
ranging from a 1-dimensional overall skill to 2-dimensional models to a 3-dimensional model

A comparison of linking methods for longitudinal designs with the 2PL model under

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/forschen/publikationen/a-comparison-of-linking-methods-for-longitudinal-designs-with-the-2pl-model-under-item-parameter-drift

This study investigates longitudinal linking of dichotomous item responses across three time points, focusing on Haberman, Haebara, Stocking-Lord linking, and concurrent calibration under item parameter drift (IPD). Joint and chain linking are examined. Three simulation studies compared these methods under IPD and different linking designs. The first study assessed linking methods under sampling error and uniform IPD, showing Haberman joint linking minimized bias and root mean square error (RMSE), especially at larger sample sizes, while concurrent calibration was most accurate without IPD. The second study introduced two designs: using anchor items across all three time points or only adjacent items between consecutive time points. Without IPD, concurrent calibration remained most precise, while under uniform IPD, Haberman methods balanced bias and precision. The third study analyzed nonuniform IPD, finding Haberman chain linking achieved the best bias and RMSE performance. Overall, chain linking outperformed joint linking under IPD. Implications for analyzing longitudinal linking designs are discussed.
des IPN A comparison of linking methods for longitudinal designs with the 2PL model

A comparison of linking methods for longitudinal designs with the 2PL model under

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/forschen/publikationen/a-comparison-of-linking-methods-for-longitudinal-designs-with-the-2pl-model-under-item-parameter-drift?show_navhelper=1

This study investigates longitudinal linking of dichotomous item responses across three time points, focusing on Haberman, Haebara, Stocking-Lord linking, and concurrent calibration under item parameter drift (IPD). Joint and chain linking are examined. Three simulation studies compared these methods under IPD and different linking designs. The first study assessed linking methods under sampling error and uniform IPD, showing Haberman joint linking minimized bias and root mean square error (RMSE), especially at larger sample sizes, while concurrent calibration was most accurate without IPD. The second study introduced two designs: using anchor items across all three time points or only adjacent items between consecutive time points. Without IPD, concurrent calibration remained most precise, while under uniform IPD, Haberman methods balanced bias and precision. The third study analyzed nonuniform IPD, finding Haberman chain linking achieved the best bias and RMSE performance. Overall, chain linking outperformed joint linking under IPD. Implications for analyzing longitudinal linking designs are discussed.
des IPN A comparison of linking methods for longitudinal designs with the 2PL model

Reading behavior as an indicator of comprehension monitoring when reading expository texts – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/forschen/publikationen/reading-behavior-as-an-indicator-of-comprehension-monitoring-when-reading-expository-texts

metacognitive monitoring are thought to be involved in building a coherent situation model – purposeful reanalysis of passages that appear inconsistent to readers improves situation model
metacognitive monitoring are thought to be involved in building a coherent situation model

Reading behavior as an indicator of comprehension monitoring when reading expository texts – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/forschen/publikationen/reading-behavior-as-an-indicator-of-comprehension-monitoring-when-reading-expository-texts?show_navhelper=1

metacognitive monitoring are thought to be involved in building a coherent situation model – purposeful reanalysis of passages that appear inconsistent to readers improves situation model
metacognitive monitoring are thought to be involved in building a coherent situation model

Comparing weighted RMSD, weighted MD, infit, and outfit item fit statistics under uniform differential item functioning – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik

https://www.leibniz-ipn.de/de/forschen/publikationen/comparing-weighted-rmsd-weighted-md-infit-and-outfit-item-fit-statistics-under-uniform-differential-item-functioning

DIF) across countries often challenges the application of a common item response model – , such as the two-parameter logistic (2PL) model, to all participating countries.
DIF) across countries often challenges the application of a common item response model