Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) ist ein Gegenwarts- und Zukunftsthema des Gesellschaftsrechts. Ein Projekt am Max-Planck-Institut für Privatrecht untersucht die juristische Bedeutung der CSR in einem historischen und internationalen Kontext.
Richtlinie zur CSR-Berichterstattungspflicht großer Unternehmen, die der Deutsche Bundestag
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) ist ein Gegenwarts- und Zukunftsthema des Gesellschaftsrechts. Ein Projekt am Max-Planck-Institut für Privatrecht untersucht die juristische Bedeutung der CSR in einem historischen und internationalen Kontext.
Richtlinie zur CSR-Berichterstattungspflicht großer Unternehmen, die der Deutsche Bundestag
Early in the present decade, political actors at the national and regional levels finally seemed to agree: if government at both levels was to remain effective, Germany‘s system of federalism needed to be reformed. Their objective was to reduce the number of federal laws requiring approval by the upper house of the federal parliament, and to increase the range of issues to be decided autonomously by state parliaments.
an equal number of high-ranking representatives of the political parties in the Bundestag
Just as customs vary from one country to another, so do the principles underlying their legal systems. Academics at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law in Hamburg apply analysis of the differences and similarities between different legal systems to develop a foundation for an international understanding of law and its application to cross-border circumstances. This also includes addressing the methodological issues of comparative law and unification of law.
The Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG), adopted by the German Bundestag on 11
Just as customs vary from one country to another, so do the principles underlying their legal systems. Academics at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law in Hamburg apply analysis of the differences and similarities between different legal systems to develop a foundation for an international understanding of law and its application to cross-border circumstances. This also includes addressing the methodological issues of comparative law and unification of law.
The Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG), adopted by the German Bundestag on 11
Just as customs vary from one country to another, so do the principles underlying their legal systems. Academics at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law in Hamburg apply analysis of the differences and similarities between different legal systems to develop a foundation for an international understanding of law and its application to cross-border circumstances. This also includes addressing the methodological issues of comparative law and unification of law.
The Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG), adopted by the German Bundestag on 11
Just as customs vary from one country to another, so do the principles underlying their legal systems. Academics at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law in Hamburg apply analysis of the differences and similarities between different legal systems to develop a foundation for an international understanding of law and its application to cross-border circumstances. This also includes addressing the methodological issues of comparative law and unification of law.
The Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG), adopted by the German Bundestag on 11
Just as customs vary from one country to another, so do the principles underlying their legal systems. Academics at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law in Hamburg apply analysis of the differences and similarities between different legal systems to develop a foundation for an international understanding of law and its application to cross-border circumstances. This also includes addressing the methodological issues of comparative law and unification of law.
The Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG), adopted by the German Bundestag on 11
Das „Gesetz zur Bekämpfung von Kinderehen“ soll Mädchen vor einer verfrühten Ehe schützen. Die Regelung, die 2017 in Kraft trat, stärkt damit ein wesentliches Prinzip der Emanzipation: das Recht von Frauen auf ein freies und selbstbestimmtes Leben. Trotzdem gibt es Kritik an dem Gesetz. Juristinnen und Juristen aus verschiedenen Max-Planck-Instituten sehen ein Problem in der rigiden Regelung und fordern, das Thema differenzierter anzugehen. Derzeit prüft auch das Bundesverfassungsgericht das Gesetz.
Im Sommer 2017 beschloss der Bundestag ein Gesetz, das die deutsche Rechtslage massiv
Das „Gesetz zur Bekämpfung von Kinderehen“ soll Mädchen vor einer verfrühten Ehe schützen. Die Regelung, die 2017 in Kraft trat, stärkt damit ein wesentliches Prinzip der Emanzipation: das Recht von Frauen auf ein freies und selbstbestimmtes Leben. Trotzdem gibt es Kritik an dem Gesetz. Juristinnen und Juristen aus verschiedenen Max-Planck-Instituten sehen ein Problem in der rigiden Regelung und fordern, das Thema differenzierter anzugehen. Derzeit prüft auch das Bundesverfassungsgericht das Gesetz.
Im Sommer 2017 beschloss der Bundestag ein Gesetz, das die deutsche Rechtslage massiv
